Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 4,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider whether ‘day-to-day’, ‘immediate’ or ‘direct’ control is required to engage a State’s immunity from enforcement and whether sufficient control is made out in this case, and whether the relevant ‘interest’ to engage the immunity could only be made out where the State had a ‘legal, equitable or contractual’ interest in the property. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
The December 2008 ruling is one of the most interesting and important decisions interpreting Roommates.com. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Nor does it impose its own notion of a child’s best interests on a family. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:34 am
(d) Within the second degree of consanguinity means a relationship in which one individual is another individual's parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sibling, or spouse thereof. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:59 am
Hicks, 2011 WL 2728353, and all the opinion says about the facts is this: “Brian C. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:28 am
a considerably improved capacity in courts to solicit or provide high-quality assessmentsthat will assist them to make safe, timely and child-focused decisions, especially at theinterim stage; and?? [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
Since then, the Court has specified in a number of cases what the scope of inquiry is for the executing authority when applying this test (See for example Case C-327/18 PPU (RO) and Case C-128/18 (Dorobantu)). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
But the word needs to get out that while the court system won’t punish intolerance, it certainly won’t reward it either. [27] All parenting issues – including health issues – must be determined based upon the best interests of the child. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
The idea behind Lexapro and other SSRIs is interesting. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:38 pm
Child injury lawyer Jonathan Rosenfeld shared his recommended child safety blogs, and wondered whether c-sections are helping or hindering the health of mothers and infants. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
The tragic child died of Lupus, in 2004. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Thus, people who objected to being vaccinated on religious grounds would not be subject to the mandate unless vaccination would be, in RFRA’s language, “the least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:38 am
Ghia still did not order a c-section. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm
§ 875(c) – prohibiting online threats). [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm
Not too long before Bill C-75, the federal government passed Bill C-46, coming into effect in December 2018. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:38 pm
Section 384-c(3) specifically states that, "the sole purpose of notice under this section shall be to enable the person served pursuant to subdivision two to present evidence to the court relevant to the best interests of the child." [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:38 pm
Section 384-c(3) specifically states that, "the sole purpose of notice under this section shall be to enable the person served pursuant to subdivision two to present evidence to the court relevant to the best interests of the child. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
C&M Door Controls, Inc., 200 N.J. 348, 356 (2009).] [read post]
