Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2010, 5:41 am by charonqc
  I am interested in the why not so much the what – so, hopefully, the podcasts will be interesting from a very different point of view. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
  Lawyer's and judges refer to this as the "BIC" (best interests of child) standard. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
    Only on issues involving their own or another child’s welfare with parental consent;                31% b. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:50 pm by PaulKostro
A parent shall not be deemed unfit unless the parents’ conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. . . . . d. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
As a mere academic, that's how I'd like to see the legal system run. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it…it’s always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm by PaulKostro
Under N.J.A.C. 10:122D-1.4(a) and (d), a written visitation plan must be developed for every child in an out-ofhome placement which must include visits with siblings, either with parental visits or separately. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am by Rosalind English
As far as the argument concerning Regulation 7A(c) was concerned, the Court considered it to be intra vires s.52(3)(d). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:42 am by Russ Bensing
  I’d be interested in knowing the results, but I kind of think there are some people who wouldn’t. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:20 am by Russ Bensing
  Latimore chose what was behind Door B, and wound up with 23 years. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm by jacquig
— (1) Subject to subsections (5) and (8) below, a person connnected with a child under the age of sixteen commits an offence if he takes or sends the child out of the United Kingdom without the appropriate consent. [(2) A person is connected with a child for the purposes of this section if— (a) he is a parent of the child; or (b) in the case of a child whose parents were not married to each other at the time of his… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:40 am by Russ Bensing
  Turns out (a) she’d moved and never told opposing counsel of her new address; (b) the defendants’ motion got to her anyway a week after they’d filed it, and (c) she’d filed a brief in opposition to the motion. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm by WSLL
DFS recognizes that relative/kinship families are important to a child's sense of identity, belonging, and long term connections.( The Family Services Manual, Chapter 7 Section B (RELATIVE/KINSHIP CARE AND DILIGENT SEARCH) (2008)).The State and the GAL characterize the kinship care policies articulated by the Social Security Act and DFS as merely precatory, i.e., they are "recommended" and should be "considered. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 6:08 pm by Stephen Page
(b) The Reasons for Judgment given this day has been read by him/her. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Was it really the case that 2 U.S.C section 441(b), the law at issue in the case, is all that was preserving our democracy? [read post]