Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
Analysis The claimant may have won on conversion but for our purposes this judgment is more interesting for its discussion of liability of public authorities in negligence, and of course the failed claims under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 12:33 pm
I had a guest on the podcast a while back – Michael Quarteraro, the President of ACEDS, who said you’re not really doing litigation if you’re not doing eDiscovery. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:59 pm
You have to say, or do, something memorable and interesting, in the midst of your business pitch. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
Although the order to deport Mr Mahajna constituted an interference with his right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) because he was unable to carry out a number of public speaking engagements in the UK, the views of the Home Secretary as to what was in the public interest were entitled to significant weight in assessing whether or not that interference was proportionate. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:45 am
Background In Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89, Mrs Higgs worked as a pastoral administrator and work experience manager at Farmor’s School. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:54 pm
This includes knowing their vocation and recreational interests. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This works by extracting facial biometrics captured in a live feed from a camera and automatically comparing them to faces on a police watchlist – a database of individuals of interest for various reasons. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
Barnard [1964] AC 1129. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Certainly the US case law – with its avowed wish to avoid “excessive entanglement” in internal religious affairs – seems to allow for the possibility of (religious) institutional interests being favoured over the individual’s right of access to the court. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
– obvious errors in Crovitz’ article (IAM) (IP Watchdog) Bilski at the BPAI – What a mess (Part 1 – Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PPAC meeting sets the stage for patent quality improvements (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Did you know... that public interest factors can trump the finding of a violation at the ITC? [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
The government hold all the aces. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:30 am
The event's target audience will be law students who are interested in future biglaw careers in Asia. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
London Borough of Enfield [2001] 2 AC 550, per Lord Browne-Wilkinson; this terminology was misunderstood by the ECtHR in Osman v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
Policy considerations, including the need to avoid potential conflicts of interest between the personal interests of directors and the company claimant, which the Court noted does not justify a general rule against preventing shareholders from pursuing claims that are consequential on a company’s loss – the principle is not confined to shareholders who are also directors. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
By and large, the media are not interested in anonymised judgments. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:14 am
Current legal situation Article 19 EPC in its present form reads (insofar as of interest to us) Article 19 Opposition Divisions(1) […](2) 1An Opposition Division shall consist of three technically qualified examiners, at least two of whom shall not have taken part in the proceedings for grant of the patent to which the opposition relates. 2An examiner who has taken part in the proceedings for the grant of the European patent may not be the Chairman. 3Before a decision is taken on the… [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
A defender has acted in breach of a duty owed to the pursuer while a pursuer has acted with a lack of regard for her own interests. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
The article finds settlement “inevitable” given the UK decision in Bloomberg LP v ZXC [2022] AC 1158 AC. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
It is of interest to compare and contrast what is said in the 184 decision and the review decision. [read post]