Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2009, 12:23 pm by Rick
  I don’t like what you’re saying! [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  We’re increasingly mandating this raw/cooked distinction, formalistic. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm by Zoe Tillman
A Washington federal judge handed a loss yesterday to three companies sued for their role in a fatal Metro rail crash in 2009, issuing an opinion (PDF) denying their motions for summary judgment. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:54 pm by Bill Otis
Judge Garland is a smart and decent man so far as I have any reason to believe, but that is not the point. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 5:08 pm
The judge granted a defense request that Little be allowed to remain free and surrender when a prison is designated by the bureau of prisons. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 6:01 am
In re University of Louisville, Serial No. 90182509 (March 24, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Martha B. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:29 am
In re Trivia Today, LLC, Serial Nos. 86760550 and 86745338 (February 8, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:03 am by Orin Kerr
The story brings to mind what I wrote in this post on the Microsoft case: If I’m reading the Magistrate Judge’s opinion correctly, you’re always interacting with Microsoft in the United States when you set up a Microsoft e-mail account. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:57 am
" In re General Mills IP Holdings II, LLC, Serial No. 86757390 (August 22, 2017) [precedential] (Opinon by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:44 am
Further, it's alleged that the FDLE never sought re-approval of the device after the Kentucky-based manufacturer made a number of significant changes to the product design. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:20 am by David DePaolo
"Harris, said during the same discussion, “God forbid judges get involved. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:33 am
In re Striker Brands LLC, Serial No. 88519404 (May 19, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:19 am
I'm assuming they're figuring out a way so that we won't be stuck looking at a person wearing goggles. [read post]