Search for: "In re D. W." Results 1841 - 1860 of 4,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: District Court W D Washington re-affirms that first sale doctrine can apply to “licensed” software: Vernor v Autodesk (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Technology & Marketing) (Ars Technica) (Spicy IP) Australian ISP in court for not disconnecting users: AFACT v iiNet (Ars Technica)… [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:57 am by David M. Lynn
The staff’s guidance appears to be directed at situations where an offering communication prepared in compliance with Rule 134 or Rule 433 is re-tweeted by a third party, or otherwise re-transmitted via a similar social media channel. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm
W-w-w-w-we get there, because of folks like my dad. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:54 pm by Kerry Sheehan
That bill was re-introduced again in 2015, this time seeking to nullify the FCC’s Open Internet Order and prevent the agency from re-issuing the same or similar rule, unless authorized by Congress. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:10 pm by Mandelman
And what about Hillary and archrival, Barack… I’d go pay-per-view to see them in the sack. ~~~~~~ ‘Course there’s Edwards, and Richardson, and Kucinich, and Biden, And when they’re asked questions they start slippin’ and sliden’. [read post]
29 May 2011, 12:22 am
& intentional fraudulent transfers to business associates and attorney. http://ow.ly/5021y 11th Cir: Obvious that §525(b) permits a private employer to "deny employment to" an individual who is or was bankrupt. http://ow.ly/5022z D-NM: Core & "related-to" jd exists in O&G case, incl. over non-debtors' disputes re O&G purchased from debtors. http://ow.ly/5023C BK-HI: Ponzi schemer's payoff of original stock inv.… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:01 am by David Kravets
The act, which has remained largely the same since President George W. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:44 am
After all, as Laura Stiller Rikleen pointed out at the Boston Globe:[W]e wonder, by what possible analysis could a woman not be appointed as only the third woman to serve on the Supreme Court since it first assembled in 1790?... [read post]