Search for: "J" Results 1841 - 1860 of 124,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2008, 4:46 am
The exchange program, to be launched in 2009, will allow up to 5,000 university students and recent graduates from the to enter the U.S. for a period of 18 months on J-1 exchange visitor visas. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Benjamin Alarie (Osler Chair in Business Law, University of Toronto; CEO, Blue J Legal) & Christopher Yan (Senior Legal Research Associate, Blue J Legal), Disguised Distributions and Management Fees: Aspro Revisited, 175 Tax Notes Fed. 1401 (May 30, 2022): In this article, Alarie and Yan analyze the Eighth Circuit’s recent... [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:54 pm
"Jessie J beats copyright appeal over smash hit 'Domino'": Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 1:26 pm by Immigration Prof
Law student Sara Ehsani-Nia wrote up this summary of the Supreme Court's June 26 per curiam order in the Executive Order "travel ban" cases: Donald J. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 12:39 pm
A reader, J (whom I take to be a professor, but I haven't used his name as he didn't post this as a comment, but sent it as an email to me), sends the following comment below. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
 This decision – the knowledge of which I owe to a kind reader of this blog – deals with an appeal against a refusal of a request by the Receiving Section (RS).The application under consideration was filed on August 13, 2009 and claimed the priority of a U.S. application that had been filed on August 14, 2008 (hereinafter “priority application”). [read post]
20 May 2024, 12:01 pm by centerforartlaw
By Viola Koenz The first impression after picking up the book Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market, edited by Sharon Hecker and Peter J. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This means in particular that the request must firstly define the factual context in which the mistake occurred and secondly adduce convincing evidence in support of the alleged cause of non-compliance.[3.3] The Boards of Appeal have consistently ruled that facts pleaded for the first time during the appeal proceedings should not in principle be taken into consideration(see J 18/98 [4], T 257/07 [1.2]).[3.4] In the present case, the board by its communication informed the appellant that the… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As can be seen from the basic proposition for a revision of the EPC of October 13, 2000 (MR/2/00, Number 6, A 122), the lawmaker wanted to keep the possibility of re-establishment into the time limit for further processing, which had been acknowledged by the case law (J 12/92 [3.2.2]; J 29/94 [3], J 902/87 [2.2-4]). [read post]