Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 10,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2014, 3:47 am
In this case, plaintiff’s motion was one to name a new party in place of a John Doe defendant. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Does the Justice Department actually believe that it can charge ICC judges with violating U.S. laws? [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Feb 14: The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has issued a "Statement of Administration Policy" on the American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2012 (H.R.7) [See WIMS 2/1/12] saying that if it were presented to the President, "the President's senior advisors would recommend that he veto this legislation. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
John Doe No. 2 ¶ 9. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 1:09 am
Business Intelligence Business Intelligence: What It Takes and What It Does (Law Tech news, 2/21/07) by BI expert John Alber of Bryan Cave is an excellent analysis and explanation of BI for law firms. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
Their whole defense was he : 1) should have mitigated by having the fusion earlier; and 2) he should have a 3 level fusion now and if he does he will be able to return to his desk job working full time (mitigation of future earnings). [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:27 pm
” (See John Bellinger’s discussion of NSPM-2, here.) [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
The CAFC pointed out that that is a misreading of HutchinsonText Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:04 am
The subjects of this post are: 1. odd suggestions for world peace and 2. what is the song "Longer Boats" about? [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:00 am
How does the Petition Process Work in Florida? [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
[1] 785 F. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
Wright, which requires “1) an initial decision to detain, followed by 2) a determination by the United States that the initial detention was proper. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Additionally, System 1 thinking can be overruled by System 2, but it takes effort. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:16 pm
The jury allocated 97% of fault to McDonald’s, and much like the Six Flags case in Georgia, apportioned only 2% of fault to one known attacker and the remaining 1% to John Doe attackers who were never identified. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:33 am
And so the Board was unable to assess the impact of Applicant's long use on the purchasing public.In sum, Applicant failed to carry its heavy burden under Section 2(f).TTABlog comment: Compare the Board's analysis here with that in recent Hershey case [TTABlogged here], where the Board was careful in recognizing that although a design may be de facto functional, the details or refinements may not be de jure functional: i.e, the scoring on the Hershey bar has a utilitarian purpose,… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:00 am
§1052(e)(1). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Does Your Congress Need Fixing? [read post]
11 May 2016, 5:47 pm
It is from there that I attempt to establish that said reason is merely a pretext constructed to hide the employer's true, discriminatory motive.*** In a willful misconduct Unemployment Hearings before a Referee, the central issues are: 1) What does the company say is the reason that it fired the claimant; and, 2) What evidence exists that supports the employer's stated reason for the termination? [read post]
