Search for: "Johnson v. United States Government" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 6:11 am
Guest contributor David Johnson, Esq., writes: The right to have one's lawyer speak (and speak, and speak . . .) at sentencing has been given some lifeblood in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
Conservative social movement activity explains the sluggish move to integrate public schools after the landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 11:46 am
  In another notable decision on the grey area separating the interests of a free press and those of law enforcement, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Government Has Joined Two San Francisco Federal Court Whistle-Blower Suits Against J&J Subsidiary, United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:21 am
This might impact the way the public views the government and whether they trust the government to make decisions with their tax dollars, especially since 75% of American’s already oppose the bailout. [19] V. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
  Thanks to some very effective advocacy by Eric Creizman and fair-minded sentencing by EDNY Judge Johnson, we have an important precedent in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:01 pm
    Senator Johnson's legislation would prohibit a registered sex offender from living anywhere in New York State within 1,000 feet of a school building, park, or day care center, for at least ten years after release, and would impose criminal penalties for violations.Because Oberlander held that State law and policy pre-empted action by local units of government with regard to sex offender residency restrictions [SORR], and… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:30 pm
Amy Howe discusses today’s opinion in No. 07-1059, United States v. [read post]