Search for: "Lopez v. Lopez" Results 1841 - 1860 of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
What César Chávez and Dolores Huerta were to California and Reies Lopez Tijerina was to New Mexico, Corky Gonzáles was to Colorado – the face and leader of the movement – brash, determined, independent, and decidedly moving toward self-determination of the Chicano community.The founding board of the Crusade for Justice is a ‘Who’s Who’ in early Chicano activism and achievement, all leaders in their own right and all achieving positions… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
What César Chávez and Dolores Huerta were to California and Reies Lopez Tijerina was to New Mexico, Corky Gonzáles was to Colorado – the face and leader of the movement – brash, determined, independent, and decidedly moving toward self-determination of the Chicano community.The founding board of the Crusade for Justice is a ‘Who’s Who’ in early Chicano activism and achievement, all leaders in their own right and all achieving positions… [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 5:56 pm
Though a fact is a thing that is known or proven to be true, its significance is entirely unrelated to itself.Harrington v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am by Josh Blackman
Lopez considered whether Congress had the power to regulate the possession of guns in school zones. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Congress' commerce authority includes the power to regulate those activities having a substantial relation to interstate commerce as held in United States v Lopez. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
Consider, for example, Thomas' view of the Commerce Clause that led to his concurring opinion in United States v Lopez. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In effect, as I see it, the understanding of the Constitution advanced by pro-mandate commentators would permit an elective economic dictatorship at the federal level in which politics provides the only restraint on the power of the government to regulate any activity that falls within the amazingly capacious post-Wickard v. [read post]