Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
Relying on the Pennsylvania doctrine that “more specific provisions control over the general ones” when two statutes are in conflict, citing Commonwealth, Dep’t of Pub. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
Relying on the Pennsylvania doctrine that “more specific provisions control over the general ones” when two statutes are in conflict, citing Commonwealth, Dep’t of Pub. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
Relying on the Pennsylvania doctrine that “more specific provisions control over the general ones” when two statutes are in conflict, citing Commonwealth, Dep’t of Pub. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
The Code specifically sets out several kinds of debts that individuals cannot get rid of, no matter how large. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Thinking about anachronisms/path dependencies, it can be helpful to think about whether we structure something as a defense or part of the confusion case, and going back and forth can make it easier or harder for a consideration to matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am
(B) Vision. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:13 am
Tryn T. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
" Here are some of Ayad's arguments on this latter point; note that Latif's briefing didn't respond to them, because it argued that Texas courts can consider such matters only in reviewing the arbitration after it takes place, rather than beforehand. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:16 am
In his view there is no ambiguity under the provision on what amounts to infringement, which differs from Article 16(b) that is not at issue in the matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:16 am
In his view there is no ambiguity under the provision on what amounts to infringement, which differs from Article 16(b) that is not at issue in the matter. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:35 pm
[T]he Content Category Reports are not commercial speech. [read post]
3 May 2018, 10:40 am
It is not, and so the Complaint must be dismissed as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
In the light of the foregoing the only novelty-related issue for the subject-matter of claim 1 is whether the content of 11, i.e. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
T 1156/01 [2.2-3], T 412/02 [5.6-9], T 908/04 [3.1-8] and T 555/05 [3.2.7-10]), this implies that the method for measuring the parameter (or at least a reference thereto) must appear completely in the claim itself, if the invention is characterised by a parameter.[2.3] As set out above, in the present case, no such method (or reference thereto) is contained in claim 1 of the main request.[2.4] In this situation, the requirements of A 84 would still be met if it… [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm
Olufunmilayo B. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
There’s some question as to whether this statute is constitutional; if it isn’t, then the whole office is unconstitutional and all its acts could be declared void. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:45 am
The late Riley B. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
The following is an essay for our symposium by Elizabeth B. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:16 pm
The crime of driving under the influence in Glendale (or anywhere else, for that matter) is serious enough. [read post]
