Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am by John Palley
(a) Exclusion Amount- (1) IN GENERAL- Subparagraph (A) of section 2010(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘$5,000,000’ and inserting ‘$1,000,000’. (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT- Subparagraph (B) of section 2010(c)(3) of such Code is amended– (A) by striking ‘2011’ in the matter preceding clause (i) and inserting ‘2012’, and (B) by striking ‘2010’ in clause (ii) and inserting… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request covered both embodiments and did not require storage of the catheter for years. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
If the OD finds that some patentable subject-matter results from a limitation/amendment, it may even inform the proprietor of the fact and allow him an opportunity to submit amended claims thereon. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
 (1-B) The presence of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail shall be obligatory at the time of final hearing of the application and passing of final order by the Court, if on an application made to it by the Public Prosecutor, the Court considers such presence necessary in the interest of justice. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Therefore, he is a proper designee for the Panel to hear this matter. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Therefore, he is a proper designee for the Panel to hear this matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A 134(8) requires that the legal practitioner be qualified in a Contracting State, that he have his place of business in that State, and that he be entitled in that State to act as a professional representative in patent matters. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It argued however that the case at issue was very particular because the claims as granted did not embrace the subject matter of the only example of the patent specification. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, it follows from what the Board has stated in points [13] to [15] above that [opponent 1] could (and should) have filed document D34 together with his statement of grounds of appeal. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
., Appellee. 1st District.Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Revocation of assisted living facility licenses, denial of licensure renewal applications, and imposition of administrative fines -- Claims against licensee were not proven where only evidence to support claims was uncorroborated hearsay -- Claim that licensee operated another assisted living facility without obtaining a valid license or qualifying for a license exemption was not proven where evidence was… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 162/82 [9]).The […] submissions of the appellant all converge to the question to be examined here, i.e. whether the refusal of the application was a violation of the provisions of A 113(1) EPC 1973 and/or those of A 94(3).[2] In its first objection the ED objected, inter alia, that the subject-matter of claim 1 then on file was unclear (A 84 EPC 1973) because the claim was directed at a method comprising, inter alia, the determination of the point of intersection of a linear object… [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 7:28 pm by Michael Webster
 We can now draw a diagram, with k on the X axis, and the Y axis reflecting the payoffs of B and R, given k people have chosen already to play B. [read post]