Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 4,606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
As such, they cannot be the beneficiaries of any fair compensation.(3) Sheet music excluded from Articles 5(2)(a) and (b), and reproductions from unlawful sources are not OKThe CJEU then addressed the question whether EU law prevents national law (like the Belgian one) that has an undifferentiated system for recovering fair compensation which also covers the copying of sheet music and counterfeit reproductions made from an unlawful source.The Court began its analysis… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Jeremy
Must Article 5(2)(a) and Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 be interpreted as authorising the Member States to introduce an undifferentiated system for recovering the fair compensation due to rightholders in the form of a lump-sum and an amount for each copy made, which, implicitly but indisputably, covers in part the copying of sheet music and counterfeit reproductions? [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:45 am by Andres
This doesn’t just refer to creative works like films, music or literature. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:38 am by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Denis Cuspert, formerly Deso Dogg, was part of an ISIS program termed “Jihad Cool” that aimed at recruiting young people partially through hip-hop--a musical genre whose reliance on the rapper’s voice avoided ISIS restrictions on musical instruments. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
nolanguage=en+-+t-623373. [9] 56th Miller Lecture: Internet Revolutionized Creativity, Changing IP Law, Georgia State University (Sep. 17, 2015), http://law.gsu.edu/2015/09/17/56th-miller-lecture/. [10] Williams v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
No, not at all: "Patents in Telecoms" is a lean, mean conference where the organisers can confidently state: "Most key players will be there in audience if not as speakers". [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals last Thursday, in State v. [read post]