Search for: "Matter of Smith v Smith"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 4,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Summaries will also be posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. (1) Sufficient evidence supported dogfighting convictions; (2) Leading question during State’s direct examination was not error; (3) The trial court did not err by ordering restitution for all the seized animals or by failing to explicitly consider the defendant’s ability to pay, but erred in converting the restitution award to a civil judgment absent statutory authorization State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am
Smith * Trademark Travesty of the Month–SMJ Group v. 417 Lafayette Restaurant * Online Message Board Protected by 47 USC 230–DiMeo v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am
Miranda v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:57 pm
The following trials and applications are listed for this term: Quantum Tuning Limited v White, 1 May 2019, listed for 3 days Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror Plc & anr, 1 May 2019, listed for 2 days Tinkler v Ferguson & ors 8 May 2019, listed for 1/2 day Allen v Times Newspapers Ltd, 9 May 2019, listed for 1/2 day Morgan v Times Newspapers Ltd. 13 May 2019, listed for 1/2 day Siddiqi v Aidiniantz & ors, 16 May 2019, listed for 2 hours… [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
For reformers: focusing on certification mark rules won’t matter if most certification happens in TMs. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
| IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funkNever Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council was hard on Tuesday 3 December. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
[Fear] v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
On appeal, Dunn argues that the district court erred in deciding as a matter of law that the Officers' use of force was objectively reasonable. 08a0433p.06 James Pickens v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
Smith argues that the majority "now flouts . . [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm
Smith, Mitan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:00 am
This includes a party’s lawyer; Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:38 pm
Spieker v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am
The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeal erred in its approach to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 in finding that one of Mozambique’s claims were ‘matters’ outside the scope of the relevant arbitration agreements, when giving judgment at [2021] EWCA 329. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:02 am
The key move was avoiding Smith and relying instead on Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 3:46 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:14 am
Here is the abstract:In 1996, Congress, as part of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, amended the list of noncommercial tort exceptions to sovereign immunity in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIA") in response to a federal court's determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Libya and alleged Libyan terrorists in Smith v. [read post]
