Search for: "Mitchell v. Mitchell" Results 1841 - 1860 of 3,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Can a Member of a Member of an LLC Sue to Dissolve the LLC?
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
JG Club Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
New York Business Divorce - http://www.nybusinessdivorce.com/
Can a Member of a Member of an LLC Sue to Dissolve the LLC?
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
JG Club Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
New York Business Divorce - http://www.nybusinessdivorce.com/
If your state allows concealed carry, then firing an employee who is licensed to carry, just because he or she keeps a gun in the car while parked at work, may invite a wrongful discharge suit.
28 Apr 2012, 9:37 am by Lorene Park
On April 26, the Kentucky Supreme Court reversed summary judgment in favor of an employer that fired an employee for keeping a gun in his car (Mitchell v University of Kentucky). [read post]
CCH WorkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog
Any answers?
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am by chief
The April edition of Legal Action brings news that Hurst v UK has settled. [read post]
nearlylegal - http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog
Any answers?
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am by chief
The April edition of Legal Action brings news that Hurst v UK has settled. [read post]
nearlylegal - http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog
Was Hathorne the best case of the term?
28 Apr 2012, 9:09 am by Zachary Spilman
See United States v. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/
Delay in Obtaining Search Warrant for Cell Phone
27 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by Susan Brenner
U.S. v. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
University Employee's Right to Bring a Gun - COTW #89
27 Apr 2012, 5:31 am
The employee in Mitchell v. [read post]
Lawffice Space - http://www.lawfficespace.com/
Kentucky Employees May Not Be Fired for Lawfully Storing Guns in Their Cars
26 Apr 2012, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what Kentucky statutes provide, and today the Kentucky Supreme Court applied this rule in Mitchell v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
Who Says Crime Doesn’t Pay?
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm by Rick
Mitchell Miller and Lance H. [read post]
Probable Cause - http://www.rhdefense.com/blog
Case o' The Week: FSA not All Cracked Up to Be -- Austin & Crack Resentencing for 11(c)(1)(C) Deals
22 Apr 2012, 2:35 pm by Steve Kalar
Mitchell L. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/
Janus, Alexander & Graf on Preventive Detention
19 Apr 2012, 5:20 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Janus , Shawn Alexander and Leah Graf (William Mitchell College of Law , affiliation not provided to SSRN and affiliation not provided to SSRN) have posted M. v. [read post]
CrimProf Blog - http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/
South Dakota AG Difiant Over FDA Order to Hand Over LI Drugs
18 Apr 2012, 9:32 am by Steve Hall
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
StandDown Texas Project - http://standdown.typepad.com/weblog/
OPINION: Kraft v. High Country Motors
18 Apr 2012, 6:52 am by scanner1
HIGH COUNTRY MOTORS, INC., and MITCHELL A. [read post]
State Law Library of Montana - http://mtlawlibrary.wordpress.com
MapleStory Enforcement Action Leads to Ridiculously Large Anti-Circumvention Damages--Nexon v. Kumar
17 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman Nexon America Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Fordham IP: copyright and music
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Fordham IP law and policy conference
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Metalitz, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Washington D.C. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
The Implied Authority of a Managing Director
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
For this proposition, reliance was placed on a first instance decision, Mitchell & Hobbs v Mill [1966] 2 BCLC 102, where Mr Machin QC had held that an individual director, as a general rule, lacks the power to commence proceedings in the name of the company. [read post]
Indian Corporate Law - http://indiacorplaw.blogspot.com/
G is for Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Christine Wilton
In the now infamous case of Gomes v. [read post]
Los Angeles Bankruptcy Law Monitor - http://www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
A pleader is obligated to give notice as to whether the matter in controversy is the subject of any other action pending in any court or of a pending arbitration proceeding, or whether any other action or arbitration proceeding is contemplated; and, if so
8 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by PaulKostro
See, e.g., Mitchell v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues