Search for: "Nation v. Nation"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 56,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2022, 4:40 am
Here is the opinion in Cross v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:48 am
” UPDATE: The Nation’s editor, Katrina vanden Heuvel, apologizes to John Tyner here. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The PTS decision violates the GATT 1994 and is not justified under the national security exception of Article XXI of the GATT 1994. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
R (M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52; [2008] WLR (D) 292 “A person's need for a refrigerator in which to keep medication did not amount to "need of care and attention" within s 21(1)(a) of the National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended) so as to entitle him to residential accommodation. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:50 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development House of Lords “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, known collectively as the A8 states, to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment registered with the Home Office was not incompatible with European Union law. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “The removal of a foreign national from the United Kingdom would be incompatible with the United Kingdom's obligations under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights as it would completely deny or nullify her right to family life in the destination country. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:25 am
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 696; [2010] WLR (D) 152 “Where a person who had been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a year or more appealed against the refusal of his claim for asylum under s 83 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 he was entitled, by virtue of the principle of equivalence under Community law, to include the refusal of his claim for humanitarian protection in the appeal. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:47 am
The conditions for recognition and enforcement set out in articles V and VI of the New York Convention (to which s 103(2), (3) and (5) give effect) constitute a complete code intended to establish a common international approach. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:25 am
Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:50 am
Here are the materials in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:29 am
Here are the briefs in Cayuga Indian Nation v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:10 am
In the much-discussed recent case of Currier v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:49 am
Without dissent or opinion, the United States Supreme Court denied the application of stay in National Organization for Marriage v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:07 pm
Circuit (Garland, Pillard, Sentelle) issued a decision in Grunewald v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Here's a quick quiz for the afternoon. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:43 pm
It's hard to argue that a decision about the applicability of a particular exclusion in an individual insurance policy as applied to a certain set of facts raises a critical issue the answer to which the universe (as opposed to the parties) awaits with bated breath. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:10 am
In Diocese of Central New York v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 7:59 am
As envisioned in McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in John Facenda, Jr. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 10:48 am
v=X5hrUGFhsXo) Some Germans, but mostly French. [read post]
