Search for: "PAUL LOWE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 3,215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2012, 10:03 am by djackson
Paul Ryan (R-WI). 218 Members of Congress, all Republicans, voted in favor of the bill, which would slash funding for Medicaid, food stamps (SNAP), child care, the Affordable Care Act, and more. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:55 am by Josh Camson
The Police Department’s Chief Spokesman, Paul J. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Paul Storer, UK IP Office Mostly been working on reforming patent court. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:01 pm
Paul Jones and Latosha Sanders purchased a new home from the builders, Centex Homes in 2004. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:37 pm by Karl-Friedrich Lenz
As Paul Gipe already noted, these tariffs are set extremely high. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:31 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Economist Paul Krugman, in his Times’ blog, says the former Bain Capital partner’s argument “might have some plausibility if the era when America didn’t have such overweening plutocracy – the 50s and 60s, when the top 0.01% received only about a fifth the share of income that it commands today – were a time of economic stagnation and low innovation. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 am by admin
If it stays low, the population will dip below 1 billion by 2060. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:21 am by Mandelman
  Embarrassingly, ABC reported that the Manhattan mailings, “mainly appear to have reached low-level workers. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
President, they’re low and they’ve been low… so what and who cares? [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:24 am by Lovechilde
Last May, they unanimously passed the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act,” banning the District of Columbia from funding abortions for low-income women. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:26 pm by Steve Davies
” The Globe & Mail story, by reporter Paul Waldie, provided context. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
By Mike Dorf Here's a puzzle: Why aren't Paul Krugman's Keynesian views more popular? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:25 pm
Rupture factor: low-ish. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:08 am by Ken Kersch
It seems from this evidence that Nixon’s calculations were electoral/political all the way down, to a degree that Terri Peretti declared herself disgusted by what she had read in the McMahon book on this, and Mark Graber reminded us of the distinction between “high” and “low” politics, so far as constitutional arguments are concerned, and declared that, by the evidence produced in the McMahon book, Nixon gave low politics a bad name. [read post]