Search for: "People v Jones"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
Jones v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
" The case, Jones v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Lofts, Steve Lowry, Gregory V. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
He noted that two people who had reacted to the protest made by the Appellants were charged and convicted for their actions. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Dow Jones [2005] QB 946). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
Far from being revolutionary, Dow Jones v Gutnick has proven to be a straightforward application of common law principles to an entirely expected outcome. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Ashby Jones: The long-awaited battle between Air Products & Chemicals and Airgas is over. ... [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
There’s more about the technical project and the people behind it from Jeni Tennison, technical lead and main developer (at TSO), on her blog. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
Jones. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Jones are not the real names but they are real people and their legal problems were all too real. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:49 am
The Court granted leave to appeal in Jones v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
”[via Lexisone] People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm
” As a narrow majority of the Supreme Court had explained in Garcia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm
Finally in People v Jones, the Court in lieu of granting leave to appeal, reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the April 3, 2008 order of the Wayne Circuit Court granting the defendant credit for time served. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
The sums of money – including the costs - involved in this case are well beyond the experience and even the contemplation of most people. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm
This Rosenberg v. [read post]
