Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 52,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 6:25 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:23 pm
" So wrote the California Court of Appeal in People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:26 pm
In the case of North Coast Children’s Home Inc. trading as Child & Adolescent Specialist Programs & Accommodation (CASPA) v Martin ([2014] NSWDC 125) a foster care organisation and two of its employees who sued over Facebook posts and emails which alleged child abuse, have been awarded a total of $250,000 in damages. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:06 pm
An example of this was underscored recently in the case of Eshelman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:55 am
In Perry v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:48 am
Torres and Maverick v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 pm
In Dobson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:22 am
Borgne, Case No. 134967, and People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 1:56 pm
FYI, this new Damon Albarn side project, The Good, The Bad & The Queen gets my thumbs up.Of course, I'm actually not too worried about this transformation, as almost all of the lawyers I've met in Vancouver so far have been exceptional people. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Yesterday, in Gundy v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
" I agree that, in the context of this case, this isn't enough to reverse the judgment. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:19 pm
Doesn't make sense.Second, I also wonder about the rationality of the death penalty scheme as applied to cases like this. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
We apparently don't use that term as much here in California as elsewhere, even though many many other states use it, and it also appears in CJS as well as in a wide variety of other treatises.)Regardless, the term's now been used in a California case, right? [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
At issue is the case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
§ 23.14 Personal Injury Damages The Case: Overstreet v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:42 pm
The Court's case summary is here. [read post]
