Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 1841 - 1860 of 5,673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
G, 2020 SCC 38 (38585) appeal from 2019 ONCA 264 “Christopher’s Law” draws discriminatory distinctions between people found guilty and people found NCRMD of sexual offences on the [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
The defendant cross-moved pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130–1.1 for an award of sanctions. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
"  The named insureds sued and the parties move and cross-moved for summary judgment. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
After conferring with both sides, the Court decided to give the entire jury a specific charge on special knowledge or experience of a juror adapting a charge addressed to juror expertise, see People v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am by admin
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011)), suffer from alcoholism during trial (People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
The People were permitted to call an additional witness, DD, who had been in one of defendant's classes but had moved to another State more than a year before the investigation into the present charges began. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bellcourt (Jurisdiction; Cross-Deputization Agreement)State of Minnesota v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
  On that basis, it did not need to consider SSE’s cross appeal based on the saving provisions in List C, CAA 2001, s 23. [read post]