Search for: "People v. Hill"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
What do people come back to? [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
Please join me as we take a trip deep into the weeds.Fact - the People are required to serve a 710.30 notice when they intend to use statements of the defendant, which meet other criteria which will not be enumerated here.Fact - Sometimes the People do not serve a 710.30 notice as to some or all statements meeting those criteria.Fact - The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, has ruled that using such statements for the purpose of impeachment is perfectly okay even so… [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am
One opponent of Sugar Hill, New Hampshire, claims that "three or four dozen people from area towns started meeting regularly to defeat the articles. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:23 pm
Look, people get their emotional rushes in different ways. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:51 pm
Hill. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm
” (Tiffany A., supra, 150 Cal.App.4th at 1357, quoting the California Supreme Court case of People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:56 pm
See Campbell v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
Jay O'Keeffe: This summer, I had a good result in construction appeal, Dunn Construction Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
App. 2008), citing Hill v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm
And when the Justices misjudge, people start hooting and hollering, especially on Capitol Hill or Pennsylvania Avenue, or in major newspapers, or in the blogosphere, and the Justices step back. [read post]
