Search for: "People v. House" Results 1841 - 1860 of 11,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 8:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The one difference is that in the Sayer case, there was a physical threat, albeit caused by the defendant sending people via ads to the victim’s house. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:12 am
Some people dream of bigger houses, faster cars, expensive jewelry, extensive travel. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:45 am by alysondrake
She was very well-known for wearing vibrant hats, but constantly told people, “it’s what’s under the hats that count! [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Unknown
The United States would be closer to fulfilling the trust responsibility if permanent supportive housing was a covered Medicaid benefit. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm by Unknown
S.2264 - A bill to reauthorize the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
    That’s physical possession of property When, right after Hurricane Katrina, FEMA and the State of Louisiana housed thousands of people in the Louisiana Superdome, that was physical possession – direct and unmistakable. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
He said that if you consider California as a house, California law can punish the conduct of the homeowner who is throwing rocks into other states and hurting people in those other states because the conduct took place in California. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
  If Roe gets wiped away, will that turn the tide in the next election and help the Democrats keep the House/Senate and retake the Supreme Court? [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
According to this report from the San Francisco Chronicle, the California Supreme Court has denied review of Defend Bayview Hunters Point Committee v. [read post]