Search for: "People v. London" Results 1841 - 1860 of 1,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
This could affect a fair few people. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Academics who presented papers included: Peter Sherer, Professor, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Predicting the Future of Large US Corporate Law Firms: AmLaw 2025 Stephen Mayson, Professor, Legal Services Policy Institute, College of Law of England and Wales, London, Global Law Firms: A Strategy Looking for a Market? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, Global Global - General Candidates for post of WIPO Director General present their platforms: (WIPO), IP is not a thing: (Dilanchian), FOSS adoption and consumer welfare: (IPcentral) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Manufacturers becoming brand licensing companies: (IP ThinkTank), Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement moves forward: (Michael Geist) Global - Patents Office Open XML voted to become official standard, so out of Microsoft’s hands: (Ars… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 3:24 am
” The opinion: London-Sire Records, et al. v Doe 1 et al. - Order on Motion to Quash After briefing, argument, and amicus participation, the Court concludes that it has insufficient information to allow the plaintiffs to take expedited discovery under these circumstances. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 am
General Gage in Boston, under orders from London to do something, sent an expedition to Concord to round up the leaders of the legislature -- people such as Samuel Adams and John Hancock -- and confiscate or destroy the hidden caches of arms. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
In other words, people have differing opinions of food. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
Ahmad, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Newham [2008] EWCA Civ 140 was Newham’s appeal of a JR decision that its allocation scheme was unlawful for failing to take adequate account of cumulative need. [read post]