Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 1841 - 1860 of 40,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
Katt), pursuant to which states may not discriminate against federal question suits. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am by Guest Author
Jarkesy, and why I believe it’s a bigger deal than most people seem to think. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
May 1, 2020) Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Bush (2008), Judge Shedd stresses that the “President and his national security advisors (unlike federal judges at all levels, lawyers, and commentators) have constant access to information ‘that may describe new and serious threats to our Nation and its people. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
In fact, the other three Appellate Divisions have all issued similar decisions (People ex rel Lewis Ward, __ AD3d __, 2008 WL 2051102 [1st Dept 5/1/08]; People ex rel Gerard v Kralik, 2008 NY Slip Op 04895 [2nd Dept 5/27/08]; Prendergast v NYS Dept of Corrections, __ AD3d __, 2008 WL 1902192 [3d Dept 5/1/08]).Seems pretty clear. [read post]