Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 1841 - 1860 of 4,038
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
Often this restriction addresses lot sizes, building lines, architectural styles, and how the property may be utilized.In Forest Hills Gardens Corporation v. 150 Greenway Terrace LLC, the Queens County Supreme Court enforced a covenant that prohibited nonresidential use of property situated within an area known as Forest Hills Gardens. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 16 November the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Phillip McKenzie v The Queen. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:10 pm
The Queen, SCR 2 (1985):673 Page 127, note 4: Canada v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 58 AD3d 1, 9-10 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 [2004]. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:50 am
  Queens Supreme granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and Eveready appealed. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55:  Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
In Lexgorge, the subject property was 48 Queen Anne Street in Marylebone, London which was built in about 1760 as a terraced house and for many years was occupied for that purpose. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
& 3 Ors v Chocosuisse Union Des Fabricants Suisses Never too late 89 [week ending on Sunday 27 March] – Cricket and copyright in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor | Are business models simply jargon? [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
  Chugai rejected UCB's construction because that construction would invalidate Claim 2 as it would capture a prior art antibody called anti-Tac referred to in a citation called "Queen". [read post]