Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am
You stated that the newspaper had paid police officers for information. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
Against that background, the Court in Otegi Mondragon applied the same principles to the royal head of State relevant there. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
In a 1941 case called Associated Press v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Judge Furgeson stated, however, the “Court shall issue a further order in the near future further explaining the Court’s reasoning in making its decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harrison, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Magistrate’s Court & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 332 (25 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v MK (Tunisia) [2011] EWCA Civ 333 (25 March 2011) Brook v Reed [2011] EWCA Civ 331 (25 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bowker & Anor (t/a Lagopus Services) v The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds [2011] EWHC 737… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
And while the attached judgment in the Florida case [State of Florida v Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry (FIPTR), see also petition for certiorari here] does not count as true research, it is my contention that it gives a snapshot of the kind of impact that such invitations can have and are having. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
Liss, The path to the future, from a voice from the past, The Space Review Reports The Royal Academy of Engineering – Global Navigation Space Systems: reliance and vulnerabilities Aviation Security: TSA’s Revised Cost Comparison Provides a More Reasonable Basis for Comparing the Costs of Private-Sector and TSA Screeners. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
RBS sought dismissal based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard) Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
It is right to state that some 18 months later, as part of an examination of material in the New York Times, the CPS signalled an intention hereon to take a broader view of the relevant legislation. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
The Court directed the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action in Jilek v Stockson, Solomon v Blue Water Village East LLC, and LaMeau v City of Royal Oak. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Everclear Ltd (BVI) v Agrest & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 232 (09 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Abdi [2011] EWCA Civ 242 (09 March 2011) Pitt & Anor v Holt & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 197 (09 March 2011) North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings, Inc & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 230 (09 March 2011) Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 241 (09 March 2011) Nunn… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
On March 4, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a Class Action Settlement in In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities Litigation, No. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:27 am
”); see also United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
In Rodrigues v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
The royal line is gone. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:01 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers v Serco Ltd (t/a Serco Docklands) [2011] EWCA Civ 226 (04 March 2011) MN (Tanzania), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 193 (04 March 2011) H v City & County of Swansea & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 195 (02 March 2011) RO, R (on the application of) v East Riding of Yorkshire Council & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Remarkably, the list stated that NGN had not searched for documents contained on or created by NGN’s computer equipment. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
