Search for: "Roman v. Roman" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by Anna Su
The POAU fought against what they felt was a sinister encroachment of the Roman Catholic Church into public schools and their claims for federal funding during the Protestant-Catholic wars in the 50s and 60s. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am by charonqc
” Modern politicians ‘as ego driven’ as the Romans This short discussion between a professor of classics and Boris Johnson is rather good, Terror suspects’ wives win European court ruling on state handouts Times: Curbs on state handouts to wives of terrorist suspects were ruled illegal yesterday by European judges and may have to be relaxed. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:52 am by Ron Coleman
There was once a dustup over the “Blue Ribbon” device in the 1932 case of Richard Hellman, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:28 pm
" Numerous commentators have downplayed the significance of Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm by Greg Mersol
  Many of the court’s reasons sprang from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:05 pm by MacIsaac
 This was addressed by the Supreme Court of Canada in a case called John Doe v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
The Channel Islands and the Canary Islands” • Jean-François Gerkens, University of Liège, “The Liberation of the Debtor in mora by vis maior, or the Incredible Success Story of a Non Roman Rule” • Adolfo Giuliani, University of Cambridge, “Two models of fact-finding” • Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam, “Some Remarks on the Direct Enforcement of Obligations to Do in the Continental Legal Tradition” • Karl… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:37 pm
  He is a Roman Catholic, and does not object to a cross being on public land. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:15 pm
" Activists think they have the needed support, but Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
The Court’s Decision Plaintiffs’ theory of commonality was rejected by Judge Kessler as identical to the failed theory presented in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
These are just some of the grounds supporting a motion by Michael Roman, one of the defendants in the massive racketeering case brought by Willis. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:21 am by Lyle Denniston
This was the first court filing by the federal government in the wake of Monday’s ruling in Burwell v. [read post]