Search for: "Russell v State"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:40 pm
Dec. 12, 2011); Russell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:52 am
At his Arizona Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog, Lawrence Koplow wrote about Arizona State Hospital v. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Kevin Russell, also of Goldstein & Russell, filed an amicus brief on behalf of former senators in support of the respondents in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
(For an example of an appointment on the question of jurisdiction, see not only the Windsor case but also Hohn v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:06 am
Abstract: The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Turner v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:19 pm
Millbrook v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
At this blog, Kevin Russell previews Millbrook v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm
Crawley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:53 am
Bank v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Mr Russell argues that it is the decision that is subject to review, and that it is wrong to split a decision into discrete issues in order to consider whether there is a deficiency in the decision. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Mr Russell argues that it is the decision that is subject to review, and that it is wrong to split a decision into discrete issues in order to consider whether there is a deficiency in the decision. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:31 pm
In Freeman Investments, LP v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
Russell v. [read post]
