Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2009, 6:59 am
With respect to the injunction barring affiliates from competing, the court stated: Moreover, precluding non-party relatives or ex-spouses from opening or operating improv-comedy-related businesses or restaurants violates CBPC § 16600. . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:00 pm
However the magistrate judge recommended denying relief on plaintiff's claim that separate worship space for Muslims should be provided.In State ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Bodyke, (2008-2502)   Ohio Courts of Appeals First District State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:34 pm
"  The other great case is State ex rel. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 1:58 pm
The problem is that, in State ex rel. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 08-660 Title: U.S. ex rel. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
  But the government has the option of staying out of a “qui tam” case, as it did in the case of U.S. ex rel. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
(in support of petitioners) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-511 Title: U.S., ex rel. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeStatutory Minimum for Possession Will Not Reduce Conspiracy TermUnited States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've praised courts that have gotten this issue right - most significantly the New York Court of Appeals in the Arons case. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Because the district court did not clearly err in finding intentional discrimination and did not abuse its discretion in awarding damages, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment for Madden. 08a0427p.06  State of Ohio ex rel. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:24 pm
Even if not, Article 3(a) would provide a clear statutory basis for jurisdiction, though United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Law Blog) Presidential politics and IP (IP Law Blog)   US General - Decisions District court tosses trade secret misappropriation suit filed by 24 Hour Fitness USA against Bally Total Fitness Holding and its CEO (Law360) State appeals court acquits Frank Herbert McClain who was sentences to seven years in prison for allegedly stealing trade secrets from former employer Didrickson Associates (Law360)   US General - Lawsuits and… [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Social Networking Sites, Blogs and Online Publishing * J.S. ex rel. [read post]