Search for: "Springs v. United States" Results 1841 - 1860 of 1,984
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
F-1 students generally are not authorized to work in the United States during the term of their educational program, with limited exceptions. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:51 am
The United States Supreme Court begins its two week spring break today. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Horvath, Heller Ehrman LLP, New York, NY Highlights in competitor and consumer lawsuits: Axcan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm
  And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 3:14 pm
The Landlord brought an application seeking an Order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant and an Order requiring the Tenant to compensate the Landlord for damages on the following grounds:[the tenant] or another occupant of the rental unit or someone he permitted in the residential complex has wilfully or negligently caused undue damage the premises; and, [the tenant] or another occupant of the rental unit or someone he permitted in the residential complex has… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed restrictions… [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:53 am
(f/n/a SFC), Defendants. 96 Civ. 3135 (JCF) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2008 U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]