Search for: "State v Locke"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 3,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2011, 10:16 pm
Supreme Court’s controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
" In McDonald v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:16 am
This is true despite the fact that data overwhelmingly shows there is very little variation in the percentage of whites v. blacks who use the drug. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 7:31 am
Four of those centers were placed on the state’s troubled facilities list. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 7:31 am
Four of those centers were placed on the state’s troubled facilities list. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 7:31 am
Four of those centers were placed on the state’s troubled facilities list. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Huff v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:48 am
Vila v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Louis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs set out above, see [17]). [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Id. at *3-4.Turning to the motions to dismiss, the court threw out the entire complaint, lock, stock and ad damnum clause. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:22 pm
By Andrew DelaneyTrudell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:07 pm
Absher v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:27 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in Elonis v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm
CTB, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:06 am
But the Supreme Court has left open—in cases like US v Knotts and US v Jones—the argument that there’s a crucial distinction between happening to overhear something, and pervasive surveillance. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:12 am
(See Thompson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:12 am
(See Thompson v. [read post]
