Search for: "State v West" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2020, 3:32 pm by Regan Zambri Long
The Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) stated reason for Take Back Day is to “provide opportunity to prevent drug addition and overdose deaths. [read post]
  (As we explained here, AB 5 codified and expanded the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
Finally, 13 states (Delaware, Idaho, Hawaii, Kentucky, Mississippi, New York, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming and West Virginia) do not explicitly specify who can collect and return ballots on the voter’s behalf. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
It explores the act’s stated purposes, as well as its philosophical underpinnings, including the topics of enfranchisement, civilizing liberal- imperialism, culturalism, extinction, and reconciliation. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 3:30 am by Anders Walker
Louis emerges at the fore mainly due to its location, a gateway to the West that was also a shipping point to the South, a “northern” state where slavery was allowed and where the Union Army launched its Indian campaigns. [read post]
According to Horlick, some of the earlier cases addressed claims of State-aid, especially international aid, for example, loans from international organizations, Marshall Plan aid to European countries, West German subsidies to West Berlin, etc. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Jane Turner
” Gill stated that working hard was her way of coping with PTSD. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:26 pm by Christopher Ernst
Late in September, the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (which covers the West Coast and contiguous states) upheld a trial court decision which held that it is the arbitrator’s purview to determine whether or not there has been a violation of a contractual class action waiver. [read post]