Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 13,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:30 pm
* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Davis v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:12 pm
Colombia and Costa Rica v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:43 pm
See Melkonyan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 8:09 am
On Tuesday, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India (‘SCI’) delivered its judgement in State of Tamil Nadu v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:20 am
Per Heard v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Last week, the Utah Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case of Utah Alunite Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
In short, not a whole lot on the subject recently.That's likely to change, so we thought we'd stay ahead of the curve and provide our readers with the lay of the land. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
‘Member State’ shall mean a Member State of the European Union. 3. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
With this background, we recently read the State of Michigan’s opening brief in Michigan v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA hands religious landowners the power to fight local and state land use regulations. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:19 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:19 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 3:50 am
Consequently, the highway is the equivalent of non-Indian fee land for jurisdictional purposes, and this case is governed by Strate v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 5:07 am
JURISDICTIONUnited States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:23 pm
Town of Madawaska v Cayer, 2014 WL 5572933 (ME 11/4/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://courts.maine.gov/opinions_orders/supreme/lawcourt/2014/14me121ca.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, SLAPP Suits, Standing [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:48 pm
Mills (Intra-Tribal Leadership Dispute, Casino Management)State of California v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 2:24 am
The ET concluded at [237] that Dr Miller’s opposition to Zionism “is not opposition to the idea of Jewish self-determination or of a preponderantly Jewish state existing in the world, but rather, as he defines it, to the exclusive realisation of Jewish rights to self-determination within a land that is home to a very substantial non-Jewish population. [read post]
