Search for: "State v. Main" Results 1841 - 1860 of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:24 am by Gene Quinn
On June 12, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Rosalind English
The Appeal  The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in  Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm by INFORRM
  This blog highlights and further develops some of the main points of criticism on the EU-ban we formulated earlier in an article in De Juristenkrant, a bi-weekly legal journal in Flanders, Belgium (Dirk Voorhoof, ‘EU legt Russia Today en Sputnik het zwijgen op: twee maten en twee gewichten’, De Juristenkrant 2022/448, 16-17). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 5:16 am by Rob Robinson
The main takeaway of this report from the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) is that the EU and Member States are on the right track to seize the benefits and promote the development of human-centric, sustainable, secure, inclusive, and trustworthy artificial intelligence in Europe. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 5:01 pm
No matter which way you look at it, they've failed. --------- For those who missed it, an important post by defense attorney Brad Bannon in the Liestoppers forum: I have read a lot of comments & commentary critical of Judge Osmond Smith and his conduct in the matters of the State of North Carolina v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:56 pm by Jason Greis
Responsibility for care also is a common law duty, as courts since Darling v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
This was the main question posed in the case of Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2010] EWCA Civ 819, the judgment of which was issued yesterday by the Court of Appeal. [read post]