Search for: "State v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  Henceforth, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:58 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Facebook Court Blesses Instagram’s Right to Unilaterally Amend Its User Agreement–Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am by Russell Knight
“When an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on appeal… An objection to evidence on the grounds of prejudice or relevance cannot be raised for the first time on appeal” Akers v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-2656 Sentencing courts have discretion to consider items such as fast-track disparity in considering requests for variant sentences premised on disagreements with the manner in which the sentencing guidelines operate, however, they are not obligated to deviate from the guidelines based on those items. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And the key authority they cite for that proposition is the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Upham v. [read post]