Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 4,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 2:58 am
At the time of his criminal trial, prevailing technology did not allow the prosecution to link DNA samples to Osborne definitively. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Duran v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:58 pm
In 2013, the United State Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 6:48 pm
For example, a corpus could be the Michigan Compiled Laws; our collection of statutes here in Michigan.According to Wikipedia, corpus linguistics is:the study of language as expressed in corpora (samples) of "real world" text. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:18 am
The Second Circuit also orders injunctive relief in favor of the abortion providers.The case is People of the State of New York v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 2:58 pm
The case is Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:26 am
Stiles v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 7:52 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:59 am
Mitchell Miller, a Professional Corp. dba Miller Law Group, P.C. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:51 am
But what about in a state that allows recreational marijuana? [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:01 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:13 am
Rescue Response Group Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am
In particular, there were periods during which the Harmony Test was not carried out in Australia, but instead samples were sent to the US for testing by Ariosa, which the primary judge found also to be infringing actions. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:28 am
That trend is one we hope and expect will continue, due in part to the effect of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
That means that other parties will not be hindered in developing technologies which also make use of the same judicial exception.Ariosa Diagnostics v SequenomAriosa Diagnostics, Inc. v Sequenom, Inc., No. 2014-1139 (Fed. [read post]
17 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Levay v. [read post]
