Search for: "State v. So "
Results 1841 - 1860
of 117,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:42 am
The case is Carlyle Aviation Partners LLC et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am
United States, in which the state sought compensation for the temporary flooding on a game management area due to a dam. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:58 am
Peugh et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:23 am
" Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
No one was arguing in the Idaho case that EMTALA codifies Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:31 am
In Figlio v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:09 am
In-custody transportation through the United States Marshals can take many weeks, with long bus rides during which defendants are shackled, and overnight stays are often in county jails and other contract facilities ill-equipped to address the needs of our incompetent clients.This week, however, the Sixth Circuit gave teeth to the statutory requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
” And if an official has authority to speak for the State, he may have the authority to do so on social media even if the law does not make that explicit. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm
, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 9:03 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
