Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 1841 - 1860 of 7,106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At the National Conference of State Legislators’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Allen v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
 3rd, in striking down the ACA’s conditioning continued participation in the Medicaid program on a state’s acceptance of the ACA’s expansion of that program, Roberts, for the first time in history, invoked a doctrine of unconstitutional “coercion” to invalidate a federal law – and, not insignificantly, drawing support from progressive justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, making for a 7-2 majority. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
By a 7-2 margin (meaning it won the support of Justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan), the court summarily reversed the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
When the court takes the bench, Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito are absent. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:20 am by Anita Krishnakumar
Observers have been quick to quote the penultimate sentence of Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissent (“Today’s decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the Court will overrule next”) and point to Hyatt as a harbinger that Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Dissent in Franchise Tax Board of California v Hyatt Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a dissent, which Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Alana Bevan
Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion for the Court reversed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which bars servicemembers from suing the federal government for personal injuries related to their military service, Stephen Vladeck, in an op-ed for The New York Times, urges Congress to overturn the Feres doctrine “in its entirety. [read post]