Search for: "Stock v. Stock" Results 1841 - 1860 of 8,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 1:08 pm by lennyesq
  Read SCOTUS Opinion… Related articles The Supreme Court has overturned the federal ban on sports betting – here’s what that means for the immediate future of gambling in America (businessinsider.com) Casino stocks are rallying after the Supreme Court struck down a ban on sports betting (MGM, CNTY)(markets.businessinsider.com) [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:42 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
If you like an extended metaphor – and anyone who has read this blog for awhile knows I do – you should enjoy the Eleventh Circuit’s decision this week in Lanfear v Home Depot, adopting the Moench presumption and explaining exactly how it is to be applied in that circuit. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:13 pm by Michael Smith
[The other articles in this seven-part series are here:  Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, Part VI, Part VII.] [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:23 am by The White Law Group
Compared to traditional investments, such as stocks, bonds and mutual funds, REITs are significantly more complex. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:55 am by Eric Goldman
The lower court judge’s wife owns Facebook stock, but the judge learned about it only after the ruling. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:19 am by Legal Talk Network
Ringler Radio special guests, Ardavan Mobasheri, American International Group (AIG) chief economist and head of global economics and John Gatesman, Senior Vice President, Specialty Markets Group at American General, join host Larry Cohen to give some insights on stock market volatility and consumer confidence, perception versus reality regarding economic factors affecting people with regard to annuities and insurance and the status of economies overseas. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Judge Seeherman's position on Section 2(e)(4) remains consistent with her concurrence in  In re Joint-Stock Company "Baik", 84 USPQ2d 1921, 1924 (TTAB 2007), in stating that the purpose behind Section 2(e)(4) is to keep surnames available to those who wish to use their own names. [read post]