Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 1841 - 1860 of 49,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
It seems to me that many people would consider the result in Kernott to be unfair (Nearly Legal calls it "a somewhat harsh outcome", and it certainly raised a few media eyebrows (see e.g. here)), and if it is then should not the law be changed? [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am by Eric Goldman
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Hunter, "Towards Amalgamationist Governance: Governor Hutt and Contradictions in British Colonial Policy Regarding Aboriginal People in Western Australia"5. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm by Orin Kerr
Under modern retroactivity law, defendants who have their cases in the pipeline get the benefit of the exclusionary rule with new law on direct review, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Richard A. Epstein
Second, the law cannot refuse to prosecute some people because it does not wish to extend its protection to particular victims of criminal behavior. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Brian Shiffrin
Pursuant to People v DeBour (40 NY2d 210) and People v Hollman (79 NY2d 181), an analysis of the lawfulness of police action for purposes of determining a suppression motion requires  the court to engage in the legal equivalent of the filming of a stop action animation. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Reva Siegel and Linda Greenhouse, Yale Law School, have posted The Unfinished Story of Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 1:52 pm by Injury at Sea
An experienced Maritime Law firm specializing in these matters can make sure the crew involved is properly taken care of. [read post]