Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 1841 - 1860 of 55,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:34 am by Russell Knight
“The law favors the amicable settlement of property rights in marital dissolution cases and all presumptions are in favor of the validity of the agreement”MARRIAGE OF PRILL v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:21 am by Eric S. Solotoff
These issues came up in the unreported (non-precedential) case of K.K. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:39 pm by Christine Corcos
Thomas Frampton, University of Virginia School of Law, is publishing The First Black Jurors and the Integration of the American Jury in the New York University Law Review for 2024. [read post]