Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2020, 2:42 pm by Joy Waltemath
On August 22, 2017, however, a federal court in the District of Columbia ordered the EEOC to reconsider this final rule on employer-sponsored wellness (AARP v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Judge Fineman granted the motion in reliance on both California and United States authority. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:23 am by Amy Howe
They filed the lawsuit that led to Thursday’s decision after they were placed on the “no fly” list, which barred them from boarding commercial flights in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Dec. 4 conference) United States v. [read post]
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax  provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9]  There are two Internal Revenue Code  (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense… [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
July 22, 2020 Memorandum for the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:50 pm by Elin Hofverberg
Although Lockwood lost this case, she would return to the Supreme Court in 1906, at the age of 76, representing the Eastern and Emigrant Cherokees in the United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, citing Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, and Matter of Banegas v GEICO Ins. [read post]
  And even the Ninth Circuit’s anticipated decision may not finally resolve the matter, as the issue could ultimately reach the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, citing Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, and Matter of Banegas v GEICO Ins. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm by Josh Blackman
The sweetest sentence came on the penultimate page: In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 4:15 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Her entry to the United States would thus alleviate an enormous burden on the U.S. [read post]