Search for: "United States v. King"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 3,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:21 am
” The United States has made such a declaration. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
” Justice Kagan also inquired pointedly about the Court’s discussion in Quality King v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
The case was initially sealed while the United States and the state of Wisconsin determined whether to intervene. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:25 am
Eight years later, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Troxel v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Siegel, 1986 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3101:9, at 4; Rep No. 95 of Comm on State Legis, Bill Jacket, L 1985, ch 294 at 16). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:44 pm
United States Work. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
In more plain English, if someone in the United States purchases legitimate copies of some item abroad that has a copyrighted work somewhere in it, can they import those items into the United States and resell them here without violating the Copyright Act? [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am
It partly reflects an increasing anxiety among them about what all that might mean if the situation is no longer what that widely-commented, initial New York Times’s front page story on the kill-list committees seemed to regard as the philosopher-king making these decisions – but a Republican. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:26 pm
., from Luxembourg, and Melvino Technologies Limited, from British Virgin Islands of Tortola, filed a barage of patent infringement lawsuits in the United Stated District Court for the Southern District of Florida, against dozens of parties domiciled across the country. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
However, in the last fifty years, the United States has removed those values of relying on one’s self and neighbors. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
” Resolution 1165 was quoted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the 1994 Von Hannover v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
(ETS), raised capital to grow his coin-operated payphone business by using a network of independent insurance agents to sell payphones to investors throughout the United States for $5,000 to $7,000 per phone. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 6:46 am
So ruled the magistrate in United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 7 v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm
Sebelius, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the most impactful case of the new millennium by upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) under Congress’ taxing power. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:56 pm
By Amy Clarise AshworthEvans Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:01 pm
Wong Kim Ark (which was citing U.S. v Rhodes, noting that one could only be a British subject or a natural-born citizen, and not hold both citizenships): All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.” LINK [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; Tot v. [read post]
