Search for: "United States v. Man" Results 1841 - 1860 of 6,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Yates then identified Samalia from the database picture as the fleeing man who had been driving the stolen vehicle.State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 1:19 pm by Susan Brenner
Code § 1983 creates a civil cause of action for violation of someone’s “rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 6:45 am by Steven Blumenthal
You can find the full text of the decision at this link United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 6:45 am by Steven Blumenthal
You can find the full text of the decision at this link United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 6:45 am by Steven Blumenthal
You can find the full text of the decision at this link United States v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:37 am
In that case, D v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgment and Decisions 1997-III), the Court had ruled that Article 3 would be violated if the U.K. forcibly returned a man who was literally at death's door to his home country in Africa. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:21 pm by Amy Howe
United States (February 21): Whether the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am by Susan Brenner
Constitution states that `The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]