Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 10:29 am by Gregory Forman
Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Post By Nicholas Krob When the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:50 pm by Record on Appeal
  The Ninth Circuit also dismissed the City’s reliance on anti-corruption interest to support the provision based on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Citizen’s United v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 5:22 pm by Howard Friedman
As has been widely reported (CNN), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals early today in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm by Zachary Spilman
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:29 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, concerning whether a judge provided an adequate explanation for a sentence reduction, split the Court 5-3. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am by Ron Pollock
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
”We deeply hope that state legislatures will not follow Mark Levin and Donald Trump, Jr. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]