Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1841 - 1860 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2021, 8:08 am by Kevin M. Finson
Both marks were used for apparel and related retail services (North 61 LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonder of human existence and renew our resolve to build a culture of life where every person of every age is protected, valued, and cherished.This month, we mark nearly 50 years since the United States Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Rather, the real winner is a growing cohort of lawyers who are filing meritless lawsuits in federal and state courts across the United States every time a merger or acquisition is announced or a corporate misfortune impacts a company’s share price… In the last five years, half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs have gone to lawyers — both plaintiff and defense.[4]   Since 2017, the plaintiffs’ bar has expanded their corporate… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm by Shannon O'Hare
Nonetheless, as Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, stated, “the good news is, Congress is not going to be the Grinch”. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
  This post will discuss only one Section 230 ruling, the Bolger v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
On January 8, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) dismissing QuikTrip West, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
On January 8, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) dismissing QuikTrip West, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]