Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 4,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am
Pant advised the State to stop taking criticism of governance as a personal insult. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Paul followed up his primer by posting a letter signed by several former high-level national security officials to Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in opposition to the Senator’s proposals to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees to the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:08 am
Republican candidates pledge not to appoint “activists,” and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton apparently pledged to pick justices who would commit to overturning Citizens United. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm
Naseer was indicted by federal authorities in 2010 and extradited from Great Britain to the United States in 2013. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
But most Americans now agree with Warren that the United States in the 1950s and 1960s desperately needed a levelheaded form of constitutional ethics in order to bring the legacy of Jim Crow to an end. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am
With all we hear about the need to respect other countries and other value systems, these harsh though widely used alternatives to prison never seem to get brought up in the discussion of the supposed moral shortcomings of the incarceration-happy United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
MailOnline lost its appeal against a High Court decision that the publication of seven paparazzi photos of Paul Weller’s children which were published in 2012 under the headline “A family day out: Paul Weller takes wife Hannah and his twin sons out for a spot of shopping in the hot LA sun”. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the existing campaign laws, as reaffirmed by Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Twenty-five years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 10:51 am
, who calls for us to "declare war and harness all of the power that the United States can bring to bear, both diplomatic and military of course, to be able to take out ISIS. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
On 11 November 2015, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the appeals of Bates v Weston; and Leeds United Football v Weston [2015] EWHC 3070 (QB). [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am
House representatives calling on Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) to schedule a vote on an Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) against the Islamic State. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:04 am
United States comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News Service. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
Marco Sassòli, The Convergence of the International Humanitarian Law of Non-International and International Armed Conflicts – The Dark Side of a Good Idea Urs Saxer, Staaten als Grundeinheiten des internationalen Systems Edzard Schmidt-Jortzig, Politik und Ethik Paul Seger, Let the Sunshine In: Five Small States on a Mission to a More Transparent United Nations Security Council Bruno Simma, »Ja, aber«: Der International Gerichtshof und das… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
With the current agreement between Israel and the United States is set to expire in 2017, Netanyahu sought an increase in annual aid from $3 billion to $4.5 billion. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
Meanwhile, the United States is intensifying its own campaign against the Islamic State in Syria. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:05 am
Colvin, November 6, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit More Blog Entries: Rand Paul Says Many Receiving SSDI Benefits Gaming System, Jan. 27, 2015, Boston Social Security Disability Insurance Lawyer Blog The post Lesterhuis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
