Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:36 am
The current law is now stated in the Equality Act 2010 but the issues in this appeal remain pertinent and are not affected by the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
In its 39-page ruling (in full here), Lords Walker and Collins say: "47. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
A similar claim by another inmate who refused a cell integration order was dismissed by a federal magistrate judge for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in Walker v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:33 am
As a law school student at Yale, Jeremy Goldman was enraptured by David Boies' commanding, if losing, performance in Bush v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
In Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The High Court decision (Mills & Ors v HSBC Trustee (C.I.) [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:18 am
It gets worse for this lawyer.The case is Gallop v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
They also referred his case to the Secretary of State with a view to him being barred from working with children. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:06 pm
" These are sometimes problematic terms that have required the attention of the United States Supreme Court in recent years, see Wall v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:31 am
court=USamp;vol=274amp;invol=357Whitney v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am
The Court of Appeal held that Argentina was protected by state immunity. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Likewise, the Virginia employees filed a class action (Walker, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:43 am
LG; Colorquick v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
I guess my view is better stated as this: one shouldnot be the first person to resort to physicality. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
Walker, William W. [read post]
