Search for: "X, Y " Results 1841 - 1860 of 4,307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 9:53 am by Jordan Bublick
 In short, what Spock is saying is that "post hoc ergo propter hoc" is a logical fallacy referring to questionable causation, that is, "since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:53 am by Jordan Bublick
 In short, what Spock is saying is that "post hoc ergo propter hoc" is a logical fallacy referring to questionable causation, that is, "since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:03 am by Jordan Bublick
Post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin: "after this, therefore because of this") is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cause variety that states "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 12:56 pm
To put it a different way, any time we claim that X caused Y, we are implicitly asserting that, in the absence of X, Y would not have occurred, or at least that its occurrence would have been less likely. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm by Bill Marler
In 2008, I explored in an op-ed the popular belief that switching from grain to grass feeding could be the solution to the problem with E. coli O157:H7 in beef cattle. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” The pattern along the x-axis, mapped against the y-axis, carries the label, “Length of Tax Code. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:47 am by Andrew Weber
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z A Afghanistan Algeria American Samoa Argentina Australia Austria B Bangladesh Bolivia Botswana Brazil C Cambodia Cameroon Canada Chile… [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:59 am by Francis Davey
While there was no need for him to decide the point (because it was agreed with the parties) he held that: the FTT has no inherent jurisdiction to grant injunctions and hence to accept undertakings there was no statutory basis for accepting an undertaking of this kind in any case the FTT had no power to enforce such an undertaking the undertakings offered before the FTT were “much too imprecise to be the proper subject of such an undertaking” What an FTT could do, he thought, in a case… [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
”Defendant:  “Regulation X also allowed us to do B. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
X, Y, and Z were foolish for keeping such things on the computer” is going further than necessary. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:44 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Describir, en inglés, las actividades en las cuales le gustaría participar durante el Internado, dónde le gustaría trabajar y por qué (de 50 a 75 palabras, en computadora a doble espacio, en papel blanco tamaño 8 ½ x 11) Resumé en inglés Transcripción oficial de créditos actualizada Dos fotos (2) 2 x 2 a color (escribir nombre y los apellidos en la parte de atrás) Entrevista… [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:47 am by Kevin
Is it enough for Thing X to be a "significant" or "substantial" factor that contributed to Event Y, or does the jury actually have to find that without Thing X, Event Y would not have happened at all? [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:01 am by JD Hull
Americans have always supported charities and, thanks to their leadership, Generations X and Y seemed to have amped up the altruistic impulse. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:01 am by JD Hull
Americans have always supported charities and, thanks to their leadership, Generations X and Y seemed to have amped up the altruistic impulse. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 8:10 pm by Michael Lumer
My job is to sell my case, to persuade my adversary, the judge, and eventually a jury, that my client's version of events is the correct one, that he or she was wronged, and that he or she was injured in some sort of way.That means more than simply identifying the facts that matter and weeding out the shiny unimportant ones, it also requires an ability to convince other that evidence that at first glance looks like X, actually means Y. [read post]