Search for: "YOUNGS v. CASE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 4:16 am by admin
For example, see Greene v Watts (1962) 210 CA2d 103 (young child may not be capable of assumption of risk or contributory negligence in dog-bite case) or the ruling in People v Berry (1991) 1 CA4th 778 (a child under the age five is not legally capable of acting with reasonable care towards a dog). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
  [Disclosure:  Howe & Russell, represented the petitioner in the third case, Jerman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
" The court also rejected Establishment Clause defenses.In Young v. [read post]