Search for: "admissions" Results 1841 - 1860 of 47,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2016, 7:51 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
If the statement would reasonably lead to intervention, the statement would be admissible under the hearsay exception 803(4) Statements for Purposes of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 5:31 am
    We also participate in several law school forums put on the by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC). [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Graham's arguments are actually defenses of other nonacademic admissions criteria. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:55 pm by Howard Bashman
“DOJ’s Prelogar given ethics waiver for SCOTUS Harvard admissions case”: Mike Scarcella of Reuters has this report. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
"U of Michigan offers self as test case for considering race in admissions": Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:14 pm by Howard Bashman
“At trial, Harvard officials explain rejecting alternatives to using race in admissions”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has this blog post. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 7:50 am by Howard Bashman
“Students for Fair Admissions sues Yale, petitions to escalate Harvard case to Supreme Court”: Amelia Davidson of The Yale Daily News has this report. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:45 am
"Texas Supreme Court case revives past improper admissions practices at UT": Lindsay Ellis of The Houston Chronicle has this report. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:18 am
"'Serendipity' plays role in Yale Law School admissions": This article appears today in The Yale Daily News. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:16 pm by Howard Bashman
“Harvard’s Admissions Process, Once Secret, Is Unveiled in Federal Court”: Anemona Hartocollis of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 3:06 am
  The article is on coverage by admission -- examination of changes in policy wording, or perhaps the lack of change, to either show or decide ambiguity. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm by Christy Unger
     Justice Kagan’s dissent (joined by Justices Scalia, Ginsburg and Sotomayor) points out that there is no majority holding on why, contrary to Melendez-Diaz and Bullcoming, such a report should be admissible. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:44 am
You did agree when you signed the arbitration agreement neatly tucked into page 7 of 12 in the Admission Agreement. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:03 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
More Blog Posts: Court Considers Whether Injury Claim Falls Under Maryland Health Care Act, Maryland Personal Injury Blog, published June 2, 2017 Maryland Court Rules Expert Testimony Required to Establish Plaintiff’s Claim for Lack of Informed Consent, Maryland Personal Injury Blog, published August 18, 2016 The post Maryland Plaintiff Objects to Admission of Expert’s Testimony in Medical Malpractice Appeal appeared first on Maryland Personal Injury Blog. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:32 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The post Court Holds Accident Victim’s Potential Medicaid and Medicare Benefits Not Admissible at Trial appeared first on Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog. [read post]